The Network Security Policy Management Market is expected to register a CAGR of 6.5% from 2025 to 2031, with a market size expanding from US$ XX million in 2024 to US$ XX Million by 2031.
The Network Security Policy Management Market report covers segmental analysis based on Component, Deployment Model, Solution, End-use, and Enterprise Size. The global analysis is further broken-down at the regional level and major countries. The Report Offers the Value in US$ for the above analysis and segments.
Purpose of the ReportThe report Network Security Policy Management Market by The Insight Partners aims to describe the present landscape and future growth, top driving factors, challenges, and opportunities. This will provide insights to various business stakeholders, such as:
- Technology Providers/Manufacturers: To understand the evolving market dynamics and know the potential growth opportunities, enabling them to make informed strategic decisions.
- Investors: To conduct a comprehensive trend analysis regarding the market growth rate, market financial projections, and opportunities that exist across the value chain.
- Regulatory bodies: To regulate policies and police activities in the market with the aim of minimizing abuse, preserving investor trust and confidence, and upholding the integrity and stability of the market.
Network Security Policy Management Market Segmentation
Component- Software
- Service
- Cloud
- On-premise
- Security Policy Management
- Change Management System
- Risk and Vulnerability Analysis
- Application Connectivity Management
- Small and Medium Enterprises
- Large Enterprises
Strategic Insights
Network Security Policy Management Market Growth Drivers- Rising Threats Drive Security Needs: The growing ransomware, phishing attacks, and data breaches have increased the demand for effective security policies. Organizations today increasingly focus on network security policy management to keep sensitive data safe and comply with compliance requirements.
- Managing Security in Cloud Environments: Hybrid or multi-cloud infrastructures are the current trend, as most infrastructures are moving to the cloud. In such scenarios, the complexity of implementing security policies across many environments increases multifold; however, NSPM solutions facilitate and automate this process with the least effort to keep security policies consistent across all environments, be it a hybrid or multi-cloud infrastructure.
- Compliance Laws Propel NSPM Adoption: Strict laws, such as GDPR, HIP7.3, and CCPA, demand companies to adhere to stringent policies regarding security measures of user data. Failure to comply with the requirements invites serious fines; thus, companies are willing to deploy NSPM to ensure compliance with evolving regulatory norms without inviting the ensuing fines.
- AI and ML Boost NSPM Automation: Solutions within the NSPM department increasingly cater to AI and ML to enable automated creation, monitoring, and enforcement of security policies. With this, insights gained from AI help diagnose vulnerabilities faster with a greater probability of an accurate response to a potential threat.
- Zero Trust Models Enhance Security: The direction followed by zero trust models ensures that no external or internal entity is trusted by default. Thus, NSPM solutions have to enforce granular security controls that are continuously monitored and validated to enhance better network protection.
- IoT Growth Drives NSPM Evolution: The next prominent scope for growth in the security of IoT is the rise in the number of Internet of Things (IoT) devices. NSPM solutions are expected to counter this trend by offering policies that protect interconnected devices against vulnerabilities and ensure security for the networks they access.
- SMEs Need Affordable Security Solutions: Most small and medium enterprises lack cybersecurity teams, and most SMEs become victims of various attacks. Thus, here NSPM vendors may provide cost-effective and streamlined solutions to the SMEs so that the SMEs may effectively maintain their network security policy.
- Advanced NSPM Offers Proactive Defense: The advanced NSPM solutions enable the ability to integrate into capabilities in advanced threat intelligence, providing higher proactivity in defense mechanisms. In this sense, the organizations may be able to effectively predict possible threats using AI analyses to ensure proper defense against the modern evolving cyber threats.
- Emerging Markets Demand Digital Security: Digitalization is rapidly gaining prominence in emerging markets such as Latin America, Africa, and Southeast Asia. Leading market growth will witness a strong potential for the expansion of NSPMs, besides huge demand for secure digital infrastructure in regions.
Market Report Scope
Key Selling Points
- Comprehensive Coverage: The report comprehensively covers the analysis of products, services, types, and end users of the Network Security Policy Management Market, providing a holistic landscape.
- Expert Analysis: The report is compiled based on the in-depth understanding of industry experts and analysts.
- Up-to-date Information: The report assures business relevance due to its coverage of recent information and data trends.
- Customization Options: This report can be customized to cater to specific client requirements and suit the business strategies aptly.
The research report on the Network Security Policy Management Market can, therefore, help spearhead the trail of decoding and understanding the industry scenario and growth prospects. Although there can be a few valid concerns, the overall benefits of this report tend to outweigh the disadvantages.
REGIONAL FRAMEWORK
Have a question?

Naveen
Naveen will walk you through a 15-minute call to present the report’s content and answer all queries if you have any.

- Sample PDF showcases the content structure and the nature of the information with qualitative and quantitative analysis.
- Request discounts available for Start-Ups & Universities
- Sample PDF showcases the content structure and the nature of the information with qualitative and quantitative analysis.
- Request discounts available for Start-Ups & Universities

Report Coverage
Revenue forecast, Company Analysis, Industry landscape, Growth factors, and Trends

Segment Covered
This text is related
to segments covered.

Regional Scope
North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Middle East & Africa, South & Central America

Country Scope
This text is related
to country scope.
Frequently Asked Questions
Some of the customization options available based on request are additional 3-5 company profiles and country-specific analysis of 3-5 countries of your choice. Customizations are to be requested/discussed before making final order confirmation, as our team would review the same and check the feasibility.
The report can be delivered in PDF/PPT format; we can also share excel dataset based on the request.
The major factors impacting the Network Security Policy Management Market are: Increasing Cybersecurity Threats, Cloud Adoption and Multi-Cloud Environments, and Regulatory Compliance Requirements.
Key future trends in this market are - Real-time analytics demand surge, Rise in hybrid cloud networks, AI-powered monitoring advancements
Key companies of this market are: AlgoSec Inc., Check Point Software Technologies Ltd., FireMon, LLC., Forcepoint LLC., Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP, IBM Corporation, Juniper Networks, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc., Sophos Ltd., Tufin Software Technologies Ltd.
The Network Security Policy Management Market is expected to register a CAGR of 7.3% from 2023-2031.
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. SCOPE OF THE STUDY
1.2. THE INSIGHT PARTNERS RESEARCH REPORT GUIDANCE
1.3. MARKET SEGMENTATION
1.3.1 Network Security Policy Management - By Component
1.3.2 Network Security Policy Management - By Deployment Model
1.3.3 Network Security Policy Management - By Solution
1.3.4 Network Security Policy Management - By End-use
1.3.5 Network Security Policy Management - By Enterprise Size
1.3.6 Network Security Policy Management - By Region
1.3.6.1 By Country
2. KEY TAKEAWAYS
3. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
4. NETWORK SECURITY POLICY MANAGEMENT LANDSCAPE
4.1. OVERVIEW
4.2. PEST ANALYSIS
4.2.1 North America - Pest Analysis
4.2.2 Europe - Pest Analysis
4.2.3 Asia-Pacific - Pest Analysis
4.2.4 Middle East and Africa - Pest Analysis
4.2.5 South and Central America - Pest Analysis
4.3. ECOSYSTEM ANALYSIS
4.4. EXPERT OPINIONS
5. NETWORK SECURITY POLICY MANAGEMENT - KEY MARKET DYNAMICS
5.1. KEY MARKET DRIVERS
5.2. KEY MARKET RESTRAINTS
5.3. KEY MARKET OPPORTUNITIES
5.4. FUTURE TRENDS
5.5. IMPACT ANALYSIS OF DRIVERS, RESTRAINTS & EXPECTED INFLUENCE OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC
6. NETWORK SECURITY POLICY MANAGEMENT - GLOBAL MARKET ANALYSIS
6.1. NETWORK SECURITY POLICY MANAGEMENT - GLOBAL MARKET OVERVIEW
6.2. NETWORK SECURITY POLICY MANAGEMENT - GLOBAL MARKET AND FORECAST TO 2028
6.3. MARKET POSITIONING/MARKET SHARE
7. NETWORK SECURITY POLICY MANAGEMENT - REVENUE AND FORECASTS TO 2028 - COMPONENT
7.1. OVERVIEW
7.2. COMPONENT MARKET FORECASTS AND ANALYSIS
7.3. SOFTWARE
7.3.1. Overview
7.3.2. Software Market Forecast and Analysis
7.4. SERVICE
7.4.1. Overview
7.4.2. Service Market Forecast and Analysis
7.4.3. Professional Services Market
7.4.3.1. Overview
7.4.3.2. Professional Services Market Forecast and Analysis
7.4.4. Managed Services Market
7.4.4.1. Overview
7.4.4.2. Managed Services Market Forecast and Analysis
8. NETWORK SECURITY POLICY MANAGEMENT - REVENUE AND FORECASTS TO 2028 - DEPLOYMENT MODEL
8.1. OVERVIEW
8.2. DEPLOYMENT MODEL MARKET FORECASTS AND ANALYSIS
8.3. CLOUD
8.3.1. Overview
8.3.2. Cloud Market Forecast and Analysis
8.3.3. Public Market
8.3.3.1. Overview
8.3.3.2. Public Market Forecast and Analysis
8.3.4. Private Market
8.3.4.1. Overview
8.3.4.2. Private Market Forecast and Analysis
8.3.5. Hybrid Market
8.3.5.1. Overview
8.3.5.2. Hybrid Market Forecast and Analysis
8.4. ON-PREMISE
8.4.1. Overview
8.4.2. On-premise Market Forecast and Analysis
9. NETWORK SECURITY POLICY MANAGEMENT - REVENUE AND FORECASTS TO 2028 - SOLUTION
9.1. OVERVIEW
9.2. SOLUTION MARKET FORECASTS AND ANALYSIS
9.3. SECURITY POLICY MANAGEMENT
9.3.1. Overview
9.3.2. Security Policy Management Market Forecast and Analysis
9.4. CHANGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
9.4.1. Overview
9.4.2. Change Management System Market Forecast and Analysis
9.5. RISK AND VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS
9.5.1. Overview
9.5.2. Risk and Vulnerability Analysis Market Forecast and Analysis
9.6. APPLICATION CONNECTIVITY MANAGEMENT
9.6.1. Overview
9.6.2. Application Connectivity Management Market Forecast and Analysis
10. NETWORK SECURITY POLICY MANAGEMENT - REVENUE AND FORECASTS TO 2028 - END-USE
10.1. OVERVIEW
10.2. END-USE MARKET FORECASTS AND ANALYSIS
10.3. BANKING, FINANCIAL SERVICES AND INSURANCE
10.3.1. Overview
10.3.2. Banking, Financial Services and Insurance Market Forecast and Analysis
10.4. HEALTHCARE
10.4.1. Overview
10.4.2. Healthcare Market Forecast and Analysis
10.5. GOVERNMENT
10.5.1. Overview
10.5.2. Government Market Forecast and Analysis
10.6. IT AND TELECOMMUNICATION
10.6.1. Overview
10.6.2. IT and Telecommunication Market Forecast and Analysis
10.7. RETAIL
10.7.1. Overview
10.7.2. Retail Market Forecast and Analysis
10.8. TRANSPORTATION
10.8.1. Overview
10.8.2. Transportation Market Forecast and Analysis
10.9. ENERGY AND UTILITIES
10.9.1. Overview
10.9.2. Energy and Utilities Market Forecast and Analysis
10.10. OTHERS
10.10.1. Overview
10.10.2. Others Market Forecast and Analysis
11. NETWORK SECURITY POLICY MANAGEMENT - REVENUE AND FORECASTS TO 2028 - ENTERPRISE SIZE
11.1. OVERVIEW
11.2. ENTERPRISE SIZE MARKET FORECASTS AND ANALYSIS
11.3. SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES
11.3.1. Overview
11.3.2. Small and Medium Enterprises Market Forecast and Analysis
11.4. LARGE ENTERPRISES
11.4.1. Overview
11.4.2. Large Enterprises Market Forecast and Analysis
12. NETWORK SECURITY POLICY MANAGEMENT REVENUE AND FORECASTS TO 2028 - GEOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS
12.1. NORTH AMERICA
12.1.1 North America Network Security Policy Management Overview
12.1.2 North America Network Security Policy Management Forecasts and Analysis
12.1.3 North America Network Security Policy Management Forecasts and Analysis - By Component
12.1.4 North America Network Security Policy Management Forecasts and Analysis - By Deployment Model
12.1.5 North America Network Security Policy Management Forecasts and Analysis - By Solution
12.1.6 North America Network Security Policy Management Forecasts and Analysis - By End-use
12.1.7 North America Network Security Policy Management Forecasts and Analysis - By Enterprise Size
12.1.8 North America Network Security Policy Management Forecasts and Analysis - By Countries
12.1.8.1 United States Network Security Policy Management
12.1.8.1.1 United States Network Security Policy Management by Component
12.1.8.1.2 United States Network Security Policy Management by Deployment Model
12.1.8.1.3 United States Network Security Policy Management by Solution
12.1.8.1.4 United States Network Security Policy Management by End-use
12.1.8.1.5 United States Network Security Policy Management by Enterprise Size
12.1.8.2 Canada Network Security Policy Management
12.1.8.2.1 Canada Network Security Policy Management by Component
12.1.8.2.2 Canada Network Security Policy Management by Deployment Model
12.1.8.2.3 Canada Network Security Policy Management by Solution
12.1.8.2.4 Canada Network Security Policy Management by End-use
12.1.8.2.5 Canada Network Security Policy Management by Enterprise Size
12.1.8.3 Mexico Network Security Policy Management
12.1.8.3.1 Mexico Network Security Policy Management by Component
12.1.8.3.2 Mexico Network Security Policy Management by Deployment Model
12.1.8.3.3 Mexico Network Security Policy Management by Solution
12.1.8.3.4 Mexico Network Security Policy Management by End-use
12.1.8.3.5 Mexico Network Security Policy Management by Enterprise Size
12.2. EUROPE
12.2.1 Europe Network Security Policy Management Overview
12.2.2 Europe Network Security Policy Management Forecasts and Analysis
12.2.3 Europe Network Security Policy Management Forecasts and Analysis - By Component
12.2.4 Europe Network Security Policy Management Forecasts and Analysis - By Deployment Model
12.2.5 Europe Network Security Policy Management Forecasts and Analysis - By Solution
12.2.6 Europe Network Security Policy Management Forecasts and Analysis - By End-use
12.2.7 Europe Network Security Policy Management Forecasts and Analysis - By Enterprise Size
12.2.8 Europe Network Security Policy Management Forecasts and Analysis - By Countries
12.2.8.1 Germany Network Security Policy Management
12.2.8.1.1 Germany Network Security Policy Management by Component
12.2.8.1.2 Germany Network Security Policy Management by Deployment Model
12.2.8.1.3 Germany Network Security Policy Management by Solution
12.2.8.1.4 Germany Network Security Policy Management by End-use
12.2.8.1.5 Germany Network Security Policy Management by Enterprise Size
12.2.8.2 France Network Security Policy Management
12.2.8.2.1 France Network Security Policy Management by Component
12.2.8.2.2 France Network Security Policy Management by Deployment Model
12.2.8.2.3 France Network Security Policy Management by Solution
12.2.8.2.4 France Network Security Policy Management by End-use
12.2.8.2.5 France Network Security Policy Management by Enterprise Size
12.2.8.3 Italy Network Security Policy Management
12.2.8.3.1 Italy Network Security Policy Management by Component
12.2.8.3.2 Italy Network Security Policy Management by Deployment Model
12.2.8.3.3 Italy Network Security Policy Management by Solution
12.2.8.3.4 Italy Network Security Policy Management by End-use
12.2.8.3.5 Italy Network Security Policy Management by Enterprise Size
12.2.8.4 United Kingdom Network Security Policy Management
12.2.8.4.1 United Kingdom Network Security Policy Management by Component
12.2.8.4.2 United Kingdom Network Security Policy Management by Deployment Model
12.2.8.4.3 United Kingdom Network Security Policy Management by Solution
12.2.8.4.4 United Kingdom Network Security Policy Management by End-use
12.2.8.4.5 United Kingdom Network Security Policy Management by Enterprise Size
12.2.8.5 Russia Network Security Policy Management
12.2.8.5.1 Russia Network Security Policy Management by Component
12.2.8.5.2 Russia Network Security Policy Management by Deployment Model
12.2.8.5.3 Russia Network Security Policy Management by Solution
12.2.8.5.4 Russia Network Security Policy Management by End-use
12.2.8.5.5 Russia Network Security Policy Management by Enterprise Size
12.2.8.6 Rest of Europe Network Security Policy Management
12.2.8.6.1 Rest of Europe Network Security Policy Management by Component
12.2.8.6.2 Rest of Europe Network Security Policy Management by Deployment Model
12.2.8.6.3 Rest of Europe Network Security Policy Management by Solution
12.2.8.6.4 Rest of Europe Network Security Policy Management by End-use
12.2.8.6.5 Rest of Europe Network Security Policy Management by Enterprise Size
12.3. ASIA-PACIFIC
12.3.1 Asia-Pacific Network Security Policy Management Overview
12.3.2 Asia-Pacific Network Security Policy Management Forecasts and Analysis
12.3.3 Asia-Pacific Network Security Policy Management Forecasts and Analysis - By Component
12.3.4 Asia-Pacific Network Security Policy Management Forecasts and Analysis - By Deployment Model
12.3.5 Asia-Pacific Network Security Policy Management Forecasts and Analysis - By Solution
12.3.6 Asia-Pacific Network Security Policy Management Forecasts and Analysis - By End-use
12.3.7 Asia-Pacific Network Security Policy Management Forecasts and Analysis - By Enterprise Size
12.3.8 Asia-Pacific Network Security Policy Management Forecasts and Analysis - By Countries
12.3.8.1 Australia Network Security Policy Management
12.3.8.1.1 Australia Network Security Policy Management by Component
12.3.8.1.2 Australia Network Security Policy Management by Deployment Model
12.3.8.1.3 Australia Network Security Policy Management by Solution
12.3.8.1.4 Australia Network Security Policy Management by End-use
12.3.8.1.5 Australia Network Security Policy Management by Enterprise Size
12.3.8.2 China Network Security Policy Management
12.3.8.2.1 China Network Security Policy Management by Component
12.3.8.2.2 China Network Security Policy Management by Deployment Model
12.3.8.2.3 China Network Security Policy Management by Solution
12.3.8.2.4 China Network Security Policy Management by End-use
12.3.8.2.5 China Network Security Policy Management by Enterprise Size
12.3.8.3 India Network Security Policy Management
12.3.8.3.1 India Network Security Policy Management by Component
12.3.8.3.2 India Network Security Policy Management by Deployment Model
12.3.8.3.3 India Network Security Policy Management by Solution
12.3.8.3.4 India Network Security Policy Management by End-use
12.3.8.3.5 India Network Security Policy Management by Enterprise Size
12.3.8.4 Japan Network Security Policy Management
12.3.8.4.1 Japan Network Security Policy Management by Component
12.3.8.4.2 Japan Network Security Policy Management by Deployment Model
12.3.8.4.3 Japan Network Security Policy Management by Solution
12.3.8.4.4 Japan Network Security Policy Management by End-use
12.3.8.4.5 Japan Network Security Policy Management by Enterprise Size
12.3.8.5 South Korea Network Security Policy Management
12.3.8.5.1 South Korea Network Security Policy Management by Component
12.3.8.5.2 South Korea Network Security Policy Management by Deployment Model
12.3.8.5.3 South Korea Network Security Policy Management by Solution
12.3.8.5.4 South Korea Network Security Policy Management by End-use
12.3.8.5.5 South Korea Network Security Policy Management by Enterprise Size
12.3.8.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific Network Security Policy Management
12.3.8.6.1 Rest of Asia-Pacific Network Security Policy Management by Component
12.3.8.6.2 Rest of Asia-Pacific Network Security Policy Management by Deployment Model
12.3.8.6.3 Rest of Asia-Pacific Network Security Policy Management by Solution
12.3.8.6.4 Rest of Asia-Pacific Network Security Policy Management by End-use
12.3.8.6.5 Rest of Asia-Pacific Network Security Policy Management by Enterprise Size
12.4. MIDDLE EAST AND AFRICA
12.4.1 Middle East and Africa Network Security Policy Management Overview
12.4.2 Middle East and Africa Network Security Policy Management Forecasts and Analysis
12.4.3 Middle East and Africa Network Security Policy Management Forecasts and Analysis - By Component
12.4.4 Middle East and Africa Network Security Policy Management Forecasts and Analysis - By Deployment Model
12.4.5 Middle East and Africa Network Security Policy Management Forecasts and Analysis - By Solution
12.4.6 Middle East and Africa Network Security Policy Management Forecasts and Analysis - By End-use
12.4.7 Middle East and Africa Network Security Policy Management Forecasts and Analysis - By Enterprise Size
12.4.8 Middle East and Africa Network Security Policy Management Forecasts and Analysis - By Countries
12.4.8.1 South Africa Network Security Policy Management
12.4.8.1.1 South Africa Network Security Policy Management by Component
12.4.8.1.2 South Africa Network Security Policy Management by Deployment Model
12.4.8.1.3 South Africa Network Security Policy Management by Solution
12.4.8.1.4 South Africa Network Security Policy Management by End-use
12.4.8.1.5 South Africa Network Security Policy Management by Enterprise Size
12.4.8.2 Saudi Arabia Network Security Policy Management
12.4.8.2.1 Saudi Arabia Network Security Policy Management by Component
12.4.8.2.2 Saudi Arabia Network Security Policy Management by Deployment Model
12.4.8.2.3 Saudi Arabia Network Security Policy Management by Solution
12.4.8.2.4 Saudi Arabia Network Security Policy Management by End-use
12.4.8.2.5 Saudi Arabia Network Security Policy Management by Enterprise Size
12.4.8.3 U.A.E Network Security Policy Management
12.4.8.3.1 U.A.E Network Security Policy Management by Component
12.4.8.3.2 U.A.E Network Security Policy Management by Deployment Model
12.4.8.3.3 U.A.E Network Security Policy Management by Solution
12.4.8.3.4 U.A.E Network Security Policy Management by End-use
12.4.8.3.5 U.A.E Network Security Policy Management by Enterprise Size
12.4.8.4 Rest of Middle East and Africa Network Security Policy Management
12.4.8.4.1 Rest of Middle East and Africa Network Security Policy Management by Component
12.4.8.4.2 Rest of Middle East and Africa Network Security Policy Management by Deployment Model
12.4.8.4.3 Rest of Middle East and Africa Network Security Policy Management by Solution
12.4.8.4.4 Rest of Middle East and Africa Network Security Policy Management by End-use
12.4.8.4.5 Rest of Middle East and Africa Network Security Policy Management by Enterprise Size
12.5. SOUTH AND CENTRAL AMERICA
12.5.1 South and Central America Network Security Policy Management Overview
12.5.2 South and Central America Network Security Policy Management Forecasts and Analysis
12.5.3 South and Central America Network Security Policy Management Forecasts and Analysis - By Component
12.5.4 South and Central America Network Security Policy Management Forecasts and Analysis - By Deployment Model
12.5.5 South and Central America Network Security Policy Management Forecasts and Analysis - By Solution
12.5.6 South and Central America Network Security Policy Management Forecasts and Analysis - By End-use
12.5.7 South and Central America Network Security Policy Management Forecasts and Analysis - By Enterprise Size
12.5.8 South and Central America Network Security Policy Management Forecasts and Analysis - By Countries
12.5.8.1 Brazil Network Security Policy Management
12.5.8.1.1 Brazil Network Security Policy Management by Component
12.5.8.1.2 Brazil Network Security Policy Management by Deployment Model
12.5.8.1.3 Brazil Network Security Policy Management by Solution
12.5.8.1.4 Brazil Network Security Policy Management by End-use
12.5.8.1.5 Brazil Network Security Policy Management by Enterprise Size
12.5.8.2 Argentina Network Security Policy Management
12.5.8.2.1 Argentina Network Security Policy Management by Component
12.5.8.2.2 Argentina Network Security Policy Management by Deployment Model
12.5.8.2.3 Argentina Network Security Policy Management by Solution
12.5.8.2.4 Argentina Network Security Policy Management by End-use
12.5.8.2.5 Argentina Network Security Policy Management by Enterprise Size
12.5.8.3 Rest of South and Central America Network Security Policy Management
12.5.8.3.1 Rest of South and Central America Network Security Policy Management by Component
12.5.8.3.2 Rest of South and Central America Network Security Policy Management by Deployment Model
12.5.8.3.3 Rest of South and Central America Network Security Policy Management by Solution
12.5.8.3.4 Rest of South and Central America Network Security Policy Management by End-use
12.5.8.3.5 Rest of South and Central America Network Security Policy Management by Enterprise Size
13. INDUSTRY LANDSCAPE
13.1. MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS
13.2. AGREEMENTS, COLLABORATIONS AND JOIN VENTURES
13.3. NEW PRODUCT LAUNCHES
13.4. EXPANSIONS AND OTHER STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENTS
14. NETWORK SECURITY POLICY MANAGEMENT, KEY COMPANY PROFILES
14.1. PALO ALTO NETWORKS, INC.
14.1.1. Key Facts
14.1.2. Business Description
14.1.3. Products and Services
14.1.4. Financial Overview
14.1.5. SWOT Analysis
14.1.6. Key Developments
14.2. ALGOSEC INC.
14.2.1. Key Facts
14.2.2. Business Description
14.2.3. Products and Services
14.2.4. Financial Overview
14.2.5. SWOT Analysis
14.2.6. Key Developments
14.3. CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
14.3.1. Key Facts
14.3.2. Business Description
14.3.3. Products and Services
14.3.4. Financial Overview
14.3.5. SWOT Analysis
14.3.6. Key Developments
14.4. FORCEPOINT LLC
14.4.1. Key Facts
14.4.2. Business Description
14.4.3. Products and Services
14.4.4. Financial Overview
14.4.5. SWOT Analysis
14.4.6. Key Developments
14.5. FIREMON, LLC
14.5.1. Key Facts
14.5.2. Business Description
14.5.3. Products and Services
14.5.4. Financial Overview
14.5.5. SWOT Analysis
14.5.6. Key Developments
14.6. HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT LP
14.6.1. Key Facts
14.6.2. Business Description
14.6.3. Products and Services
14.6.4. Financial Overview
14.6.5. SWOT Analysis
14.6.6. Key Developments
14.7. IBM CORPORATION
14.7.1. Key Facts
14.7.2. Business Description
14.7.3. Products and Services
14.7.4. Financial Overview
14.7.5. SWOT Analysis
14.7.6. Key Developments
14.8. JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC.
14.8.1. Key Facts
14.8.2. Business Description
14.8.3. Products and Services
14.8.4. Financial Overview
14.8.5. SWOT Analysis
14.8.6. Key Developments
14.9. SOPHOS LTD.
14.9.1. Key Facts
14.9.2. Business Description
14.9.3. Products and Services
14.9.4. Financial Overview
14.9.5. SWOT Analysis
14.9.6. Key Developments
14.10. TUFIN SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
14.10.1. Key Facts
14.10.2. Business Description
14.10.3. Products and Services
14.10.4. Financial Overview
14.10.5. SWOT Analysis
14.10.6. Key Developments
15. APPENDIX
15.1. ABOUT THE INSIGHT PARTNERS
15.2. GLOSSARY OF TERMS
1. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
2. AlgoSec Inc.
3. Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
4. Forcepoint LLC
5. FireMon, LLC
6. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP
7. IBM Corporation
8. Juniper Networks, Inc.
9. Sophos Ltd.
10. Tufin Software Technologies Ltd.
The Insight Partners performs research in 4 major stages: Data Collection & Secondary Research, Primary Research, Data Analysis and Data Triangulation & Final Review.
- Data Collection and Secondary Research:
As a market research and consulting firm operating from a decade, we have published many reports and advised several clients across the globe. First step for any study will start with an assessment of currently available data and insights from existing reports. Further, historical and current market information is collected from Investor Presentations, Annual Reports, SEC Filings, etc., and other information related to company’s performance and market positioning are gathered from Paid Databases (Factiva, Hoovers, and Reuters) and various other publications available in public domain.
Several associations trade associates, technical forums, institutes, societies and organizations are accessed to gain technical as well as market related insights through their publications such as research papers, blogs and press releases related to the studies are referred to get cues about the market. Further, white papers, journals, magazines, and other news articles published in the last 3 years are scrutinized and analyzed to understand the current market trends.
- Primary Research:
The primarily interview analysis comprise of data obtained from industry participants interview and answers to survey questions gathered by in-house primary team.
For primary research, interviews are conducted with industry experts/CEOs/Marketing Managers/Sales Managers/VPs/Subject Matter Experts from both demand and supply side to get a 360-degree view of the market. The primary team conducts several interviews based on the complexity of the markets to understand the various market trends and dynamics which makes research more credible and precise.
A typical research interview fulfils the following functions:
- Provides first-hand information on the market size, market trends, growth trends, competitive landscape, and outlook
- Validates and strengthens in-house secondary research findings
- Develops the analysis team’s expertise and market understanding
Primary research involves email interactions and telephone interviews for each market, category, segment, and sub-segment across geographies. The participants who typically take part in such a process include, but are not limited to:
- Industry participants: VPs, business development managers, market intelligence managers and national sales managers
- Outside experts: Valuation experts, research analysts and key opinion leaders specializing in the electronics and semiconductor industry.
Below is the breakup of our primary respondents by company, designation, and region:
Once we receive the confirmation from primary research sources or primary respondents, we finalize the base year market estimation and forecast the data as per the macroeconomic and microeconomic factors assessed during data collection.
- Data Analysis:
Once data is validated through both secondary as well as primary respondents, we finalize the market estimations by hypothesis formulation and factor analysis at regional and country level.
- 3.1 Macro-Economic Factor Analysis:
We analyse macroeconomic indicators such the gross domestic product (GDP), increase in the demand for goods and services across industries, technological advancement, regional economic growth, governmental policies, the influence of COVID-19, PEST analysis, and other aspects. This analysis aids in setting benchmarks for various nations/regions and approximating market splits. Additionally, the general trend of the aforementioned components aid in determining the market's development possibilities.
- 3.2 Country Level Data:
Various factors that are especially aligned to the country are taken into account to determine the market size for a certain area and country, including the presence of vendors, such as headquarters and offices, the country's GDP, demand patterns, and industry growth. To comprehend the market dynamics for the nation, a number of growth variables, inhibitors, application areas, and current market trends are researched. The aforementioned elements aid in determining the country's overall market's growth potential.
- 3.3 Company Profile:
The “Table of Contents” is formulated by listing and analyzing more than 25 - 30 companies operating in the market ecosystem across geographies. However, we profile only 10 companies as a standard practice in our syndicate reports. These 10 companies comprise leading, emerging, and regional players. Nonetheless, our analysis is not restricted to the 10 listed companies, we also analyze other companies present in the market to develop a holistic view and understand the prevailing trends. The “Company Profiles” section in the report covers key facts, business description, products & services, financial information, SWOT analysis, and key developments. The financial information presented is extracted from the annual reports and official documents of the publicly listed companies. Upon collecting the information for the sections of respective companies, we verify them via various primary sources and then compile the data in respective company profiles. The company level information helps us in deriving the base number as well as in forecasting the market size.
- 3.4 Developing Base Number:
Aggregation of sales statistics (2020-2022) and macro-economic factor, and other secondary and primary research insights are utilized to arrive at base number and related market shares for 2022. The data gaps are identified in this step and relevant market data is analyzed, collected from paid primary interviews or databases. On finalizing the base year market size, forecasts are developed on the basis of macro-economic, industry and market growth factors and company level analysis.
- Data Triangulation and Final Review:
The market findings and base year market size calculations are validated from supply as well as demand side. Demand side validations are based on macro-economic factor analysis and benchmarks for respective regions and countries. In case of supply side validations, revenues of major companies are estimated (in case not available) based on industry benchmark, approximate number of employees, product portfolio, and primary interviews revenues are gathered. Further revenue from target product/service segment is assessed to avoid overshooting of market statistics. In case of heavy deviations between supply and demand side values, all thes steps are repeated to achieve synchronization.
We follow an iterative model, wherein we share our research findings with Subject Matter Experts (SME’s) and Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs) until consensus view of the market is not formulated – this model negates any drastic deviation in the opinions of experts. Only validated and universally acceptable research findings are quoted in our reports.
We have important check points that we use to validate our research findings – which we call – data triangulation, where we validate the information, we generate from secondary sources with primary interviews and then we re-validate with our internal data bases and Subject matter experts. This comprehensive model enables us to deliver high quality, reliable data in shortest possible time.